AF FORM Yes No PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE A and B Member unable to sign PRIVACY ACT INFORMATION The. Get the AF FORM ,Pg 1 – Description. OFFICER PERFORMANCE REPORT (Lt thru Col) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFI. 2 Arial 10 bold absolute 13 AF FORM , C:\Documents and . EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE (A and B) Arial 7 plain center absolute.

Author: Datilar Dourisar
Country: Mali
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 26 September 2010
Pages: 204
PDF File Size: 19.39 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.86 Mb
ISBN: 925-9-23352-631-6
Downloads: 75452
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yojin

An evaluator must be a colonel or equivalent to close out report as a single evaluator. The CSS will administer the unit performance report program for the commander.

Promotion recommendations and other comments are not allowed. Elimination of the assessment bar scale. Comments on medical issues are prohibited and cannot be included in the OPR fofm.

Use bullet format to provide comments that add meaning and are compatible with ratings in Section IV. In these cases, it may be more appropriate or necessary to have the departed evaluator endorse the report using his or her duty information as of the report close-out dateor it may be necessary to identify another individual to indorse the report.

They must return reports with unsupported or inappropriate statements for additional information or reconsideration of ratings. Additional access points will be determined by local procedures. See Notes 8 and 9.

If feedback was not performed, an explanation must be provided. Number of Days Supervision. If the evaluator is a civilian or a member of a foreign service no entry is required. The Ratee must acknowledge receipt of the report before it becomes a matter of record.

Reviewers may comment only under the following circumstances: Enter ratee’s organizational information as of the close-out date using the guidance below. foem


Utilize the referral memo located on the reverse of the form. Forms that are not digitally signed will require the date to be handwritten.

Implementation Instructions For New OPR & PFW

Do not repeat comments provided in previous section. School designation status is reflected on the Officer Selection Brief. Limit text to four lines. Extensions beyond this period are not allowed.

Implementation Instructions For New OPR & PFW

7707b Rating Biases and Personal Perceptions. This description must reflect the uniqueness of each ratee’s job. Digitally signed evaluations are considered a matter of record once they are loaded into ARMS. Digital signature feature is independent of other digital signatures. Additional Raters assigned ag or prior to close-out date, enter information as of the close-out date; Additional Raters assigned after the close-out date, enter the information as of the date signed.

Digital signatures will be used except in the following cases: Do not enter any comments in the reviewers block. Enter the number of days the rater supervised the ratee during the reporting period. Required feedbacks may be accomplished on previous edition pending availability. Referral reports will be accomplished with wet hand written signatures only. Must use bullet format. See definition of rating chain in VormAttachment 1 and paragraph 3.

Send performance report notices to the rater and, when applicable, attach Letters of Evaluation LOEs for the reporting period to the notices. The rater will provide face to face feedback to the ratee 7707b conjunction with issuing the evaluation.

The Component will be listed at the end of the statement. If, after discussion, the disagreement remains, the disagreeing evaluator marks the non-concur block, and provides specific comments to explain each item in disagreement.

Officer Performance Report

Annual, use the date one year from the close-out of previous OPR or TR from a school of 20 weeks or more, or: Bullets are limited to two lines per bullet. The evaluation and memo can also be faxed to the next evaluator if a scanner is unavailable. All seven performance factors are consolidated in this block. Evaluators must comment on a ratee who does not meet standards.


Reviewer cannot sign before the additional rater due to security features associated with digital signature capability. Once a digital signature has been applied, it cannot be deleted.

In Section IV, rater certifies performance feedback in this area by entering the date the most recent feedback was provided during the rating period, this included midterm feedback or any subsequent feedback requested by the ratee.

See AFIparagraphs 3. If any data is incorrect, notify the CSS for correction. The next evaluator in the chain will act on behalf of the evaluator who is deployed and issue the letter and evaluation to the ratee. Select appropriate choice from drop down menu: In the rare instance where digital signatures cannot be used, sign in reproducible blue or black ink and handwrite the date. Performance report suspenses are set such that the evaluation should be closed out prior to evaluators or the ratee departing.

Once a digital signature is applied, the comments and ratings are locked and cannot be changed, in addition, the digital signatures cannot be deleted. Additional raters may be no higher in the organization than the senior rater. Disciplinary action is not required.

work_outlinePosted in Food