Frederick Charles Beiser is an American author and professor of philosophy at Syracuse He has since edited two Cambridge anthologies on Hegel, The Cambridge Companion to Hegel () and The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and. Buy Hegel (The Routledge Philosophers) 1 by Frederick Beiser (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on. Frederick Beiser’s Hegel ushers in a new series, ‘Routledge Philosophers.’ The list of contributing authors is a distinguished one, yet nobody.
|Published (Last):||16 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||3.95 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As for Hegel’s philosophy of art, while Beiser justly remarks on its relative neglect in the literature, he fails to take note of much recent work, especially Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert’s studies of the various lecture series the scholarly problems hegle almost intractable, more so than with say the philosophy of religion.
Jun 27, Enoch Kuo rated it really liked it. The objections and concerns raised in this review, when considered in light of the overall quality hegle the text, are minor quibbles and reflections on what is undoubtedly an exemplary achievement. Open Preview See a Problem? He returned to the United States four years later. This “greater” identity does not exclude anything that seems alien to it, because for a concept to actually develop itself, it is necessary for it to posit or encounter its other and to recognize itself in its other.
He puts forward one popular perspective and its prime competitor then shows how Hegel attempted to synthesise them. Beiser bluntly dispels the myth of thesis-antithesis-synthesis, but it seems to hold implicitly for each briser. Here Beiser draws upon some of the most recent scholarship on the German romantic generation, in particular the work of Dieter Heinrich and Michael Franz. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
One should add that Beiser has the grace also to admit that Hegel’s grand synthesis is often clearer in its aims than in its achieved result. As one might expect, Beiser is particularly good on contextual issues; it is how he made his reputation after all. The path he follows introducing the topics is logical and clear and, although some of the ideas are tough and he didn’t always give me an “aha” moment, is generally pretty good at explaining. At the same time, I felt he introduced new readings of specific theoretical questions doing a good job presenting the conflicting viewpoints and defending his interpretation with interesting arguments as well textual references.
Engaged and independent in his assessments, he adopts a manner that is the opposite of a bland encyclopedia entry. He places Hegel in the historical context of nineteenth-century Germany whilst clarifying the deep insights and originality of Hegel’s philosophy.
Philosophy students will need to go on to more focussed books Houlgate is good for the next levelbut this is a rich, interesting study that you’ll wish other scholars emulated.
He is also one of the hardest philosophers to understand and his complex ideas, though rewarding, are often misunderstood. The intuition they championed, on the other hand, reveals only an inchoate and underdeveloped image of the infinite. Beiser’s first book, The Fate of Reason: Again, while Beiser is right to mention Hegel’s debt to Romanticism, the reference to his “uncompromising classicism” is a canard: As soon as those limits are removed in speculative thought, the other ceases to be an absolute other and is reconciled into a greater whole.
This may well be a minor quibble: It did not disappoint. The result is a more concretely developed concept of the infinite, and philosophy is precisely this endless development. The ideas themselves are fascinating and presented in a way that I was interested even when I thought they were total bollocks. The Routledge Philosophers 1 – 10 of 18 books. He then argues that metaphysics is everywhere relevant in Hegel’s system, for otherwise some of his claims on ethics or aesthetics would become incomprehensible.
Luke Brennan rated it really liked it Jun 04, Daniel Hush rated it liked it Dec 13, Routledge- Philosophy – pages. Many of the central diffi Not being much of a Hegel scholar myself, I can’t critique Beiser’s interpretation of and engagement with other interpretations of Hegel, but the book came to me highly recommended as a clear and careful introduction to Hegel.
Hegel – Frederick C. Beiser – Google Books
Drue rated it really liked it Mar 17, Naturphilosophieboth in their centrality to any historical understanding of German Idealism, as well as their continued relevance to contemporary philosophy. Hegel is a good example of the philosopher as product of his time, and Beiser does an incredible job of explaining the contemporary issues he was responding to.
Many of the central difficulties that Hegel and others of the time were trying to navigate at the time are set forward with clear and almost analytic precision, yet the book does not seem to sacrifice careful and nuanced interpretation to simplicity of style. Beiser tends to psychologize the battle, to speak about “respect” for another’s “desires” or for its “status” as a human being.
True, attending to Wittgensteinian themes can easily seem anachronistic, or conversely sound already somewhat dated, or Beiser’s major objection will fail to sort out Hegel’s own contributions from those of his peers.
I didn’t find myself lost at any point, even when I couldn’t wrap my head Pretty interesting and well written introduction to Hegel. He explains how in its most abstract terms, Hegel’s entire philosophy is an attempt to reveal the identity of identity and non-identity. At the same time it leads Beiser to slight the so-called “analytic” interpretation which has been instrumental in the recent Anglophone revival of Hegel’s philosophy, since Findlay and others.
Hegel is one of the more caricatured philosophical figures, and this book serves incredibly well to dispel many of the misunderstandings about him by emphasising the fundamental systematic role of metaphysics in his thought. In situating Hegel so well in his intellectual context, an approach which is of course fitting considering the importance of wider culture and society to Hegel’s thought, he helps the reader have some sympathy with the ideas.
Frederick C. Beiser
This scenario is plausible, yet if we consider Hegel’s relation to his time, we are likely to feel that his major concern was not to systematize, but instead to question every system for its purported systematicity. Beiseg Beiser does an admirable job, displaying a thorough familiarity with the complex world of the late belser and early nineteenth century German milieu.
Equally welcome in my view is Beiser’s emphasis on the formative role played by Jena Romanticism; Hegel’s ehgel attitude towards Schlegel and company indicates how significant they were for him.
He then spent the springs of and at the University of Wisconsin—Madison and University of Colorado Boulderrespectively. He is author of The Fate of Reason: Jul 01, tom bomp rated it really liked it Shelves: